Assassin's Creed Valhalla Ps4 Vs Pc

• For information on humanitarian relief/support efforts for Ukraine, and how y'all can help, please visit this thread.

Assassinator'due south Creed Valhalla PS5 vs PC version

• Thread starter hlhbk
• Start date Jul i, 2021

You lot are using an out of appointment browser. It may not brandish this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

• #one

I recently started playing the PC port of Air conditioning: Five with all settings maxed. I really like it (I am shocked cause I wasn't a fan of the change of direction to an RPG). I however have noticed on PC the draw altitude is pretty bad and there is a lot of pop in right in front of me. I am reading others seeing the same. I as well read the PS5 version didn't have this upshot possibly? Can anyone confirm this? Also graphically how does the PS5 port compare to PC?

For clarification all settings are maxed at 1440p.

Specs:

Intel 8700k
32 GB RAM
Nvidia RTX 3080
SSD

• #2

Wouldn't that (perchance) depend on your settings and specs?

• #three

Wouldn't that (possibly) depend on your settings and specs?

Updated OP with this.

• #5

Can you clarify if the popular in is the same?

• #half-dozen

Tin you analyze if the pop in is the same?

Draw Distance / Density on grass is higher on PS5, equivalent to an Ultra setting that doesn't be.

You tin open the config file in your Documents/Assassin's Creed Valhalla folder and increase a few settings.

Grapheme=2 can be increased to 4. Information technology's for NPC LOD's and is not a setting in the menu, simply was for ACO.
SSAO=two tin exist increased to 3, which would be Very High in ACO
Rain=ii tin can exist increased to 3, non sure if information technology does anything, just it doesn't revert.

Tessellation, Fog, Terrain none of those piece of work and may even crash the game.

• #7

The port is pretty bad, stuttering on slower DDR4, utterly poor operation on Nvidia & the settings are tuned lower than Odyssey'southward PC version which makes the PS5/SX versions of Valhalla graphically better, honestly Ubisoft probably did the last part on purpose.

• #viii

Always become with panel for Ubisoft games

• #9

Why is the audio in this game then bad? Ruins it.

• #ten

E'er become with console for Ubisoft games

The port is pretty bad, stuttering on slower DDR4, utterly poor performance on Nvidia & the settings are tuned lower than Odyssey's PC version which makes the PS5/SX versions of Valhalla graphically better, honestly Ubisoft probably did the final part on purpose.

I'm playing on PC(3090) and to me, it'due south meliorate than the console version. They patched just most all the problems and it runs looks much much better than the console version; Epitome quality is much much better on PC. I have the Series X version to compare against.

I wouldn't go past this vid because it'southward 7 months old. A lot has changed.

• #eleven

I hateful the console version runs at dynamic res between 1440p and topping out at 1800p at the best of times. If yous can live with that, accept at information technology.

• #12

E'er go with console for Ubisoft games

This isn't typically true at all.

• #13

E'er go with console for Ubisoft games

I wouldn't say this for all Ubisoft games as the PC versions of Far Cry for instance are unremarkably sublime. This probably applies merely to Air-conditioning and maybe WD.

• #14

This isn't typically truthful at all.

It is for the most role...Rainbow Vi Siege is the exception.

• #xv

I'one thousand playing on PC(3090) and to me, it's better than the panel version. They patched just about all the problems and it runs looks much much ameliorate than the panel version; Epitome quality is much much amend on PC. I accept the Serial 10 version to compare against.

I wouldn't go by this vid considering it'south 7 months quondam. A lot has changed.

DumpsterJuice
Are you seeing the texture pop in i am describing? If I am in the boat when first arriving in Europe textures aren't on the ground on the far banking company and the textures popular in constantly.

• #sixteen

I had a similar issue with information technology recently. When I went into the settings I found the game had reverted a few of the settings back down to medium for some reason. I recollect World Details specifically was lowered.

• #17

It is for the most part...Rainbow 6 Siege is the exception.

Really?

Far Weep, Lookout man Dogs, AC Origins and Odyssey are superior on PC. Most users with decent PCs are going to become superior frame rates at college resolutons and graphic settings. These games, other than Watch Dogs Legion for some people, also scale so if you have a low powered mobile CPU/GPU you can still play the games with low settings.

Information technology seems similar, and i'grand probably crazy, Ubi doensn't give a shit about their PC ports correct now due to Epic exclusivity deals. If AC Valhalla was on Steam in the state it was/is in would be a much bigger deal. Steam reviews would have roasted it and at that place would be a large stink all over the internet.

• #eighteen

I had a similar issue with it recently. When I went into the settings I found the game had reverted a few of the settings dorsum downward to medium for some reason. I remember World Details specifically was lowered.

Triple checked that. All are maxed out.

• #19

Always go with panel for Ubisoft games

Nah but wait for them to exist $19.99 on PC (also aren't air-conditioning games 30fps on consoles?)

They don't launch on Steam now anyway, so I'g not really a potential customer for them at launch in the first place.

• #20

I wish information technology didn't sound like utter shit

• #21

I wish it didn't audio like utter shit

I am playing with a DAC and it sounds great?

I am so on the argue on if I should buy the ps5 version.....

• #22

PC too still has a ton of crashes for me and it's been that way since day 1. Honestly the port is a mess.

• #23

I am playing with a DAC and it sounds great?

I am so on the fence on if I should buy the ps5 version.....

It'due south been a talking point of the game for a while

• #24

I wish it didn't sound like utter shit

So bad.

• #25

Triple checked that. All are maxed out.

Weird, I've got similar specs just with a 2080ti instead and take seen no noticeable pop in outside of when it dropped my settings downwardly. Maybe the settings didn't salve correctly, have yous tried resetting everything back to default and then changing them up to max once again?

• #26

The sound drove me madddddddd wish I'd googled information technology forty hours earlier as I thought it was me / my arrangement.

• #27

Weird, I've got similar specs just with a 2080ti instead and have seen no noticeable pop in outside of when information technology dropped my settings down. Perchance the settings didn't save correctly, have you tried resetting everything dorsum to default so changing them up to max over again?

I'll endeavor deleting the configuration files and recreating them. If it continues I'll record and post here. I really don't want to become ps5 version and go through the opening again.

Has ubi ever fixed the fact you can have more foilage on the ps5 version than the highest settings on pc?

• #28

I take some adequately decent headphones with a separate amp and dac. I legitimately thought someone had sat on my headphones or something when I booted the game upwardly. Atrocious sound.

• #29

Really?

Far Cry, Watch Dogs, Air-conditioning Origins and Odyssey are superior on PC. Almost users with decent PCs are going to get superior frame rates at higher resolutons and graphic settings. These games, other than Spotter Dogs Legion for some people, besides scale so if you take a low powered mobile CPU/GPU y'all tin yet play the games with low settings.

Information technology seems like, and i'thou probably crazy, Ubi doensn't requite a shit nigh their PC ports right now due to Ballsy exclusivity deals. If Ac Valhalla was on Steam in the country information technology was/is in would be a much bigger deal. Steam reviews would have roasted it and there would be a big stink all over the cyberspace.

It's hit or miss for me and my personal rule is to always go with console versions of UBI games.

Far Weep 4 had stuttering issues that I could never get rid of
Far Cry v seemed fine
Far Weep ND performed far worse that FC5 for me
The new AC trilogy requires insanely high specs for what information technology does compared to console versions

Thinking more than about information technology though their ports aren't terrible, it's just that UBI games just feel more tailored to consoles for some reasons. Plus in that location'due south the EGS affair.

• #xxx

It'due south hit or miss for me and my personal rule is to e'er become with console versions of UBI games.

Far Cry iv had stuttering issues that I could never get rid of
Far Cry 5 seemed fine
Far Weep ND performed far worse that FC5 for me
The new Ac trilogy requires insanely high specs for what information technology does compared to panel versions

Thinking more than about it though their ports aren't terrible, it's just that UBI games just experience more tailored to consoles for some reasons. Plus there's the EGS thing.

I mean until the PS5 / X Series X came out it was the option between 60+ fps and 30 fps. If your pc could run the games at 60 fps then there is literally no question which platform is superior for their games.

• #31

I'll try deleting the configuration files and recreating them. If it continues I'll record and mail here. I really don't want to go ps5 version and go through the opening again.

Has ubi ever stock-still the fact yous can accept more foilage on the ps5 version than the highest settings on pc?

Anyone know about the foilage?

• #32

I am playing with a DAC and it sounds cracking?

I am so on the fence on if I should purchase the ps5 version.....

The sound quality is horrifically bad.

• #33

Information technology'south a shit port I will rip on.

Seriously ubisoft the crew games experience better on my pc than valhalla does.

Horrible framepacing to the point 90-144fps isn't smoothen on whatever machine. This is pathetic in light of what flight simulator is most to give gamers.

Neither platform is getting what they could.

• #34

Information technology'southward a shit port I will rip on.

Seriously ubisoft the crew games feel better on my pc than valhalla does.

Horrible framepacing to the point xc-144fps isn't smooth on whatsoever machine. This is pathetic in light of what flying simulator is about to give gamers.

Neither platform is getting what they could.

Neither platform? What's wrong with console version LCGeek ?

• #35

I tried both the PC and PS5 versions. Ended upwardly sticking with PS5, got around 40 hours in it now.

The PC version is fine and performed "ok" - unlike Origins and Odyssey it doesn't seem like a cpu killer, it seems very gpu dependant this time around, although I've heard people say the game shits itself with lower RAM speed. Mine is 3200, paired with a 10700k and rtx 3070. At 1440p it was running at effectually 75-80 fps with near max settings IIRC. Was a good fourth dimension.

but I dont actually like ownership not steam games, just tried the game using the ubisoft sub service. Bought information technology on PS5 and it runs fine. Its 60 fps most of the time, although in that location is definitely drops here and there. Some bizarre screen tearing in places too where it feels like it shouldn't be doing that. And micro freezes that final half a 2d here and there, usually 15-20 mins apart - apparently this is likely caused by the online services so it might affect other platforms too, dunno. Doesn't e'er happen though.

graphically i honestly couldn't tell the PC and PS5 versions apart. The PS5 foilage item may still be college only it'south hardly something that you find unless yous take two instances of the game running. Footing detail popular in is pretty bad on both versions, although it'south honestly generally noticable in Norway... in England, you lot have a lot of foilage which side steps this issue imo.

• #36

I'yard playing on PC(3090) and to me, it's better than the console version. They patched just almost all the issues and it runs looks much much better than the console version; Image quality is much much better on PC. I have the Serial X version to compare confronting.

I wouldn't get past this vid because it's 7 months old. A lot has changed.

nah. Console version for this ane is superior

• #37

I tried both the PC and PS5 versions. Concluded upwardly sticking with PS5, got around xl hours in it now.

The PC version is fine and performed "ok" - unlike Origins and Odyssey information technology doesn't seem similar a cpu killer, it seems very gpu dependant this fourth dimension around, although I've heard people say the game shits itself with lower RAM speed. Mine is 3200, paired with a 10700k and rtx 3070. At 1440p it was running at effectually 75-lxxx fps with virtually max settings IIRC. Was a good time.

but I dont really like buying non steam games, only tried the game using the ubisoft sub service. Bought it on PS5 and it runs fine. Its threescore fps nigh of the fourth dimension, although there is definitely drops here and in that location. Some bizarre screen tearing in places likewise where it feels similar information technology shouldn't be doing that. And micro freezes that final half a second here and there, usually xv-xx mins apart - patently this is probable caused by the online services so information technology might affect other platforms besides, dunno. Doesn't always happen though.

graphically i honestly couldn't tell the PC and PS5 versions apart. The PS5 foilage detail may nonetheless be higher but information technology'south hardly something that you detect unless yous accept ii instances of the game running. Ground detail pop in is pretty bad on both versions, although it'southward honestly generally noticable in Norway... in England, yous accept a lot of foilage which side steps this issue imo.

I am trying to figure out if what I am seeing is normal. On PC When y'all first sailed into England and don't take command of the ship did you run across an obvious blurry texture like maybe ten feet from you and every bit you got closer the grass and other foilage would announced out of nowhere? Does it do this on PS5 too?

• #38

Ubisoft could not brand a proficient PC port if the entire fucking earth depended on it.

• #39

I am trying to figure out if what I am seeing is normal. On PC When you showtime sailed into England and don't have control of the ship did you see an obvious blurry texture like maybe ten feet from yous and as you lot got closer the grass and other foilage would appear out of nowhere? Does it do this on PS5 too?

Sad, I don't really recall specifically stuff like that, but I tin can't say I noticed too many "obviously" blurry textures (at least up close). Not actually related merely Odyssey'southward PC version has a bug that I still don't think got fixed where certain armours volition switch to lower quality versions in cutscenes (yous tin really see them become in a lower quality state when the camera switches) which was pretty abrasive. The panel versions didn't have this issue. Ubisoft pc ports tend to be non the best.

• #twoscore

Sorry, I don't really remember specifically stuff like that, simply I tin can't say I noticed too many "obviously" blurry textures (at least up shut). Non really related merely Odyssey's PC version has a bug that I withal don't think got fixed where sure armours will switch to lower quality versions in cutscenes (yous can really see them get in a lower quality country when the photographic camera switches) which was pretty abrasive. The panel versions didn't have this issue. Ubisoft pc ports tend to exist not the best.

I had actually restarted cause I stopped playing for months afterward getting to England and don't remember pop in being this bad.

• #41

nah. Console version for this i is superior

Not from my experience it isn't. I like the PC version better.

DumpsterJuice
Are you seeing the texture pop in i am describing? If I am in the gunkhole when showtime arriving in Europe textures aren't on the ground on the far depository financial institution and the textures pop in constantly.

I'll check this night.

My PC config for reference:
10700k
3090 FE
32GB 3200
2 TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus NVME bulldoze
ASUS ROG Maximus XII Hero

• #42

Ye the sound bug are really mindblowing. Such a shame. Stopped playing because of information technology.

• #43

Y'all can encounter what I am talking about in this video. Look at the ground and hills on the left after the concatenation is broken and they are sailing. The textures look like a blurry mesh textures and the grass and such appears the closer y'all get.

That isn't my stream so possibly its not my game having an outcome?

• #44

Not from my experience it isn't. I similar the PC version ameliorate.

I'll check this evening.

My PC config for reference:
10700k
3090 FE
32GB 3200
2 TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus NVME drive
ASUS ROG Maximus XII Hero

Cheers sir.

• #45

Neither platform? What'due south wrong with console version LCGeek ?

Considering the ability that is in them I feel the engine does them a disservice. Nil wrong it's not equally good as it could exist.

• #46

Their rendering pipeline isn't as skilful as the likes of Rockstars for RDRII when it comes to open up World lod. But and then once again not many companies are. Hopefully this improves with next gen games. I think Valhalla looks astounding overall though. One of the most under rated games this gen visually. They absolutely nailed the English countryside.

The sound quality is horrifically bad.

Has to do with early on covid recording restrictions I'm guessing.

• #47

Their rendering pipeline isn't every bit good as the likes of Rockstars for RDRII when it comes to open World lod. Merely then again non many companies are. Hopefully this improves with next gen games. I think Valhalla looks astounding overall though. One of the well-nigh under rated games this gen visually. They absolutely nailed the English countryside.

Has to do with early on covid recording restrictions I'm guessing.

I could see that being the case for the compressed dialog since they probably recorded it all remotely. For the other sound effects I'm not sure that was the upshot. It's non like this is the firs time. Odyssey and Origins in item both had bad audio mixing and compressed audio simply Valhalla takes it to another level of awful.

• #48

I could see that being the case for the compressed dialog since they probably recorded information technology all remotely. For the other sound furnishings I'm not sure that was the issue. It's not similar this is the firs time. Odyssey and Origins in detail both had bad audio mixing and compressed audio but Valhalla takes it to another level of awful.

Ah didn't realise the other two suffered the aforementioned issues.

• #49

Their rendering pipeline isn't as good as the likes of Rockstars for RDRII when information technology comes to open Globe lod. Just and then again non many companies are. Hopefully this improves with next gen games. I think Valhalla looks astounding overall though. 1 of the well-nigh under rated games this gen visually. They absolutely nailed the English countryside.

Has to do with early covid recording restrictions I'm guessing.

The open globe looks very good but the characters look awful. And the clipping is atrocious.

• #50

PC as well all the same has a ton of crashes for me and it'south been that way since day one. Honestly the port is a mess.

Endeavour and delete the enshroud folder for Valhalla in Documents. After i did that i had 0 crashes and i completed the Druid DLC without whatever problems.

Source: https://www.resetera.com/threads/assassins-creed-valhalla-ps5-vs-pc-version.450892/

Share this post